It s not Hindu religion that needs to be reorganized but Hindu society.
The Clash of Civilisations", Samuel P. Huntington´s influential and closely reasoned essay, categorically states, "The next world war, if there is one, will be a war between civilisations." And Huntington identifies religion, customs and institutions as the basis for defining a civilisation. Given the internecine religious strife in the Subcontinent, this ominous forecast was weighing heavily on my mind when the invitation to define my brand of Hinduism reached me. A welter of conflicting emotions stimulated my resolve to take a stand as a modern Hindu.
Maintaining that Hinduism is a movement and not a religion in the strict sense of the term, Sarvepalli Radhakrishnan in 1926 had stated:
After a long winter of some centuries, we are today in one of the creative periods of Hinduism. We are beginning to look upon our ancient faith with fresh eyes. We feel that our society is in a condition of unstable equilibrium. There is much wood that is dead and diseased that has to be cleared away. Leaders of Hindu thought and practice are convinced that the times require, not a surrender of the basic principles of Hinduism, but a restatement of them with special reference to the needs of a more complex and mobile social order. Such an attempt will only be a repetition of a process which has occurred a number of times in the history of Hinduism. The work of readjustment is in process. Growth is slow when the roots are deep. But those who light a little candle in the darkness will help make the whole sky aflame.